Discussion about this post

User's avatar
C ALAN's avatar

If someone is asked to not do something (follow a rule) and the rule is reasonable and not harming that person but that person explicitly and intentionally ignores the request and does it anyway, that person should face a consequence. IMO

You can argue about the consequence (the fine, the amount, etc.). But can we agree that deliberate antagonistic actions warrant consequences?

Jim Fawcette's avatar

I counted 5 at the time, so that's only $8,000 apiece to use an f-bomb on TV. Bargain!

Perhaps the ATP was having a "Fifth one free" promotion?

Seriously, Moutet deserved the penalty but perhaps the ATP should do what Sweden does with traffic tickets, make the penalty proportionate to income? Surely this merits less punishment than any of, say, Djokovic's outbursts that risked injury to ball kids, linespeople and fans?

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?